On May 31, 2017, a grain dust explosion ripped through the Didion Milling facility in the community of Cambria, Wisconsin. The tragic incident resulted in three fatalities and 13 injuries. Two of the injured later died in hospital bringing the total to five lives lost.
A subsequent OSHA investigation found that a fire had occurred two days prior to the incident in a fluidized bed dryer and that the company had previous citations from 2011 including missing explosion protection on dust collecting units.
On November 11, 2017, OSHA released their report outlining the citations and penalties to Didion Milling Inc. Review of the citations gives important insight into several deficiencies that may have lead to initiation of the explosion incident, as well as the severity of the outcome. These citations are reviewed in the following article.
Lastly, a section at the end of the post highlights fundraising campaigns where you can support the victims, families, and community effected by the Didion Milling explosion. If you know of any other campaigns, please leave them in the comments and I will add them to the list.
Summary of Penalties
The OSHA citation report identified two separate citations (Serious and Willful) with a total of 19 items of noncomplience. A wilful violation is the most severe and requires that the employer either knowignly failed to comply with legal requirments or acted with plain indeifference to employee safety (see definitions here).
For ease of reference, the violations have been further divided into categories including equipment, training, maintenance, housekeeping, and PPE in the following.
Serious Penalties
A summary of the “Serious” violation penalties is given below. Equipment violations included absent fire protection, explosion protection, and noncomplient training and maintenance programs.
- Serious (Equipment): $38,025
- Serious (Training & Maintenance): $25,350
Wilful Penalties
A summary of the “Willful” violation penalties is given as follows. The largest of these penalties are for an inadequate or ineffective housekeeping program which may have increased the overall scale of the devastating explosion.
- Willful (Equipment): $253,498
- Willful (Housekeeping): $760,494
- Willful (Safety Systems): $253,498
- Willful (Personal Protective Equipment): $126,749
- Willful (Maintenance): $380,247
Total
In total, the proposed penalties amounted to $1.8 M. Didion Milling had until January 9, 2018 to contest the penalties and/or provide abatement action. To the authors knowledge, information has not been made public regarding either action to date.
- Total Serious (Citation 1): $63,375
- Total Wilful (Citation 2): $1,774,468
- Total Proposed Penalties: $1,837,861
Didion Milling OSHA Citations
The following sections outline the serious and wilful violations indicated by OSHA. Where provided in the report, the equipment, location in the facility, and acceptable protection methods for the violation are provided.
Serious Violations (Equipment)
Citation 1, Items 1, 3, and 5 covered serious violations regarding grain processing equipment. These include absence of automatic fire protection on the fluidized bed dryer, absence of explosion protection on many dust collectors, and absence of an effective means to remove ferrous material from grain size reduction equipment.
Citation 1/Item 1 Violation: OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1) Description: Indoor fluid bed dryer not equipped with automatic fire protection Equipment: Expander #5 Fluid Bed Dryer (1st Floor, C Mill) Protection Methods: NFPA 61, S:8.3.9.4.3 (dryer fire detection, alarm, and interlocking system) NFPA 61, S:8.3.9.4.4 (dryer suppression and extinguishing systems) Proposed Penalty: $12,675.00 |
Citation 1/Item 3 Violation: 29 CFR 1910.272(l)(2) Description: Indoor filter collectors not equipped with explosion suppression system Equipment: a) Kice filter dust collector (3rd floor mezzanine, F Mill) b) Torit dust collector (2nd floor, F Mill) c) Flex-Kleen/Bran dust collector (4th floor, D Mill) d) Bran dust collector (2nd floot, D Mill) e) Pack Line #1 Dust Collector (Packing Room Mezzanine) f) Clean Cor Dust Collector (4th Flor, B Mill) g) BGM Dust Collector (4th Floor, B Mill) h) Expander #3 Fine Grinder Collector (4th Floor, B Mill) i) Expander/Extruder/Pre-Gel Dust Collector (4th Foor, B Mill) j) NW Dust Collector (4th Foor, B Mill) k) NC Dust Collector (6th Foor, A Mill) l) NE Dust Collector (6th Foor, A Mill) m) SW Dust Collector (6th Foor, A Mill) n) SC Dust Collector (6th Foor, A Mill) o) SE Dust Collector (6th Foor, A Mill) p) Bulk Loadout Dust Collector (2th Foor, Bulk Loadout) Proposed Penalty: $12,675.00 |
Citation 1/Item 5 Violation: 29 CFR 1910.272(n) Description: Size reduction equipment did not have means to remove ferrous material Equipment: a) Roll Stand #1 East/South (2nd Floor mezzanine, B Mill) b) Roll Stand #2 East/South (2nd Floor mezzanine, B Mill) c) Roll Stand #3 East/South (2nd Floor mezzanine, B Mill) d) Roll Stand #4 East/South (2nd Floor mezzanine, B Mill) e) Roll Stand #5 East/South (2nd Floor mezzanine, B Mill) f) Roll Stand #6 East/South (2nd Floor mezzanine, B Mill) g) South Bram Grinder Bauermeister (1st Floor, B Mill) h) Coarse Roller Mill Unit (4th Floor, D Mill) i) Fines Roller Mill Unit (4th Floor, D Mill) Proposed Penalty: $12,675.00 |
Serious Violations (Training & Preventative Maintenance)
Citation 1, items 2 and 4 covered serious violations regarding employee training and preventative maintenance of equipment. OSHA proposes that employees were not trained annually on common ignition sources and housekeeping practices, and that the 1st floor, C mill dryer did not have an effective preventative maintenance program.
Citation 1/Item 2 Violation: 29 CFR 1910272(e)(1) Description: Employees not trained annualy on: a) Common ignition sources a) Safety practices (Including housekeeping and use of compressed air) Proposed Penalty: $12,675.00 |
Citation 1/Item 4 Violation: 29 CFR 1910.272(m)(l)(i) Description: No preventative maintenance program for grain drying equipment Equipment: Expander #5 Fluid Bed Dryer (1st Floor, C Mill) Proposed Penalty: $12,675.00 |
Willful Violations (Equipment)
Citation 2, Items 1 and 14 covered wilful violations regarding grain processing equipment. These included bonding and grounding switch station flex hoses and failure to promptly correct dust collection system deficiencies.
Citation 2/Item 1 Violation: OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1) Description: Pneumatic conveying systems not conductive, bonded, and grounded. Equipment: Switch Staton Flex Hoses (5th Floor, A Mill) Protection Methods: NFPA 61, S:8.3.3.2 (system components to be electrically conductive) NFPA 61, S:8.5.2.2 (bonding and grounding as static ignition source control) NFPA 77, S:15.7.2 (pipes and ducts to be metal and grounded) NFPA 77, S:15.8.1 (prohibited use of non-conductive flexible hoses) Proposed Penalty: $126,6749.00 |
Citation 1/Item 14 Violation: 29 CFR 1910.272(m)(2) Description: Failure to promptly correct dust collection system deficiencies Equipment: Pack Line Dust Collector Proposed Penalty: $126,749.00 |
Willful Violations (Housekeeping)
Citation 2, Items 4 through 9 covered wilful violations regarding housecleaning. These include a proposed $633,745 penalty for absence of a compliant fugitive dust housekeeping program in several areas of the facilities, and $126,749 for the use of compressed air in the vicinity of running machinery.
Citation 2/Item 4/5/6/7/8 Violation: 29 CFR 1910.272(j)(l) Description: Absence of compliant fugitive dust housekeeping program Locations: a) 1st Floor, A Mill b) 1st Floor, B Mill c) 4th Floor, B Mill d) 3rd Floor, F Mill e) Pack Area Proposed Penalty: $633,745.00 |
Citation 2/Item 9 Violation: 29 CFR 1910.272(j)(3) Description: Compressed air used in presence of running machinery Protection Methods: See NFPA 61 for guidance on use of compressed air Proposed Penalty: $126,749.00 |
Willful Violations (Safety Systems)
Citation 2, Items 3 and 12 covered wilful violations regarding facility safety systems. These include absence of a compliant employee alarm system and absence of regularly scheduled inspection of safety control equipment such as monitors, sensors, alarms, and interlock equipment.
Citation 2/Item 3a/b Violation: 29 CFR 1910.272(d) and 29 CFR 1910.38(d) Description: Absence of compliant employee alarm system Proposed Penalty: $126,6749.00 |
Citation 1/Item 12 Violation: 29 CFR 1910.272(m)(l)(i) Description: Absence of regularly scheduled inspection of safety control equipment Proposed Penalty: $126,749.00 |
Willful Violations (Personal Protective Equipment)
Citation 2, Item 2 covers wilful violations regarding personal protective equipment (PPE). OSHA proposes that flame-resistant clothing was not provided to protect employees form potential flash fires in the milling, packaging, and bulk load out areas of the facility.
Citation 2/Item 2 Violation: 29 CFR 1910.132(a) Description: Failure to provide flame-resistant clothing Protection Methods: See NFPA 2113 for guidance on use of flame-resistant garmets Proposed Penalty: $126,749.00 |
Willful Violations (Maintenance)
The last violations, citation 2, items 10, 11, and 13 cover wilful violations regarding equipment maintenance. This includes scheduled inspections and shut-down for cleaning of three gap mills, and regular lubrication as outlined in the manufacture’s operations manual.
Citation 1/Item 10a/b Violation: 29 CFR 1910.272(m)(l)(i) and 29 CFR 1910.272(m)(l)(ii) Description: Absence of regularly scheduled mechanical equipment inspections Absence of regularly scheduled lubrication of equipment Absence of regularly scheduled shut-down and cleaning Equipment: North Bauermeister GM-120 Gap Mill (1st Floor, B Mill) Proposed Penalty: $126,749.00 |
Citation 1/Item 11a/b Violation: 29 CFR 1910.272(m)(l)(i) and 29 CFR 1910.272(m)(l)(ii) Description: Absence of regularly scheduled mechanical equipment inspections Absence of regularly scheduled lubrication of equipment Absence of regularly scheduled shut-down and cleaning Equipment: South Bauermeister GM-120 Gap Mill (1st Floor, B Mill) Proposed Penalty: $126,749.00 |
Citation 1/Item 13 Violation: 29 CFR 1910.272(m)(l)(ii) Description: Absence of regularly scheduled lubrication of equipment Absence of regularly scheduled shut-down and cleaning Equipment: Pregel Bauermeister GM-80 Gap Mill (1st Floor, B Mill) Proposed Penalty: $126,749.00 |
Support the Victims
Several fundraising campaigns have been developed to support the victims and community of Cambria. Please visit these campaigns and find out how you can support those involved:
- Pray For Cambria: GoFundMe Campaign
- Support the Block Family: GoFundMe Campaign
- Support the Tordoff Family: GoFundMe Campaign
- General donations for the community can be sent by contacting The Old Mill Foundation
Conclusion
In conclusion, the OSHA citations and penalties give insight into the potential factors leading the severity of the Didion Milling explosion.
Four sides of the dust explosion pentagon are present in most grain handling equipment. The only side that is missing is an ignition source. As such, precautions around tramp metal, static electricity buildup, equipment lubrication, and equipment maintenance are of the upmost importance to avoid a flash fire or explosion incident.
Furthermore, one must assume that at some point all five sides will be present in such equipment and a deflagration will occur. As such, explosion protection is necessary on dryers and dust collectors, and PPE is necessary for workers in these areas to avoid injury and loss.
Lastly, explosion in an isolated piece of equipment is dangerous and potentially fatal to near-by workers. However, total facility loss and destruction on the scale seen in the Didion milling explosion is not near as likely with an effective housekeeping program in place. Avoiding using compressed air and making sure that dust accumulation is below explosible levels is necessary in any facilities handling grain dust.